Impact of Cardiac Disease on Prognosis in Patients with Systemic AL Amyloidosis
2024-3
PDF_2024-17-3_237-245 (Russian)

Keywords

AL amyloidosis
cardiac AL amyloidosis
diagnosis
prognosis

How to Cite

1.
Pirogova O.V., Kudyasheva O.V., Chernous M.V., et al. Impact of Cardiac Disease on Prognosis in Patients with Systemic AL Amyloidosis. Клиническая онкогематология. 2024;17(3):237-245. doi:10.21320/2500-2139-2024-17-3-237-245

Keywords

Abstract

AIM. To assess the clinical features as well as the factors affecting prognosis and long-term treatment outcomes in systemic AL amyloidosis patients with cardiac involvement.

MATERIALS & METHODS. The trial enrolled 123 systemic AL amyloidosis patients with cardiac involvement who were treated at the RM Gorbacheva Scientific Research Institute in 2004–2023. The patients were 34–85 years of age (median 61 years); there were 61 women (49.6 %) and 62 men (50.4 %).

RESULTS. Cardiac disease grades 1, 2, 3a, and 3b were identified in 13.8 %, 50.4 %, 17.9 %, and 17.9 % of AL amyloidosis patients, respectively. Chronic cardiac failure (CCF) developed in 65.9 % (n = 81), and severe cardiac failure was detected in 25.4 % (n = 31) of patients. Most of them (90,2 %), despite CCF, preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (> 40 %) with the mean value of 59.6 % (range 33–78 %). The left ventricular stroke volume index (SVI) was below the normal values (< 41 mL/m2) in 92.7 % of patients. The mean SVI value was 26.1 mL/m2 (range 8.3–49.5 mL/m2). The lower SVI was associated with cardiac disease grades. This parameter appeared to be 30.9 mL/m2, 26.8 mL/m2, 24.8 mL/m2, and 21.4 mL/m2 in grades 1, 2, 3a, and 3b (= 0.006), respectively. Total global strain (TGS) in the left ventricle myocardium was decreased (< 20 %) in 94.6 % of patients. The mean TGS value was 13.8 % (range 4.4–34.8 %). TGS was diminishing with increasing cardiac disease grade (grade 1 with 17.8 %, grade 2 with 14.6 %, grade 3a with 13.1 %, and grade 3b with 9.6 %) (= 0.007). Atrial fibrillation was reported in 23 % of patients, supraventricular tachycardia was observed in 31.9 %, and supraventricular extrasystoles were registered in 39.7 %. Ventricular extrasystoles were found in 73.7 % of patients, and ventricular tachycardia was seen in 13.2 %. Sinoatrial block was reported in 6.6 % of patients, and atrioventricular block was identified in 19.8 %. Syncope occurred in 12.3 % of patients. An artificial cardiac pacemaker was implanted in 8 patients. The thromboembolism rate was 13 %: the myocardial infarction rate was 11.4 %, and the rate of acute cerebrovascular accidents was 5.7 %. Atrial clots were detected in 2 (1.6 %) patients. The cumulative incidence of hematologic response for 2 years was 57 % and did not depend on cardiac disease grade, the 2-year rate of cardiac response was 39.1 %. Before achieving hematologic and cardiac responses, mortality was 26.5 % and 29.9 %, respectively. The overall 5-year survival was 62.6 %, and the 5-year hematologic progression-free and major organ impairment-free survival was 39.3 %. Cox regression model confirmed 3 independent predictors of poor prognosis: the level of NT-proBNP ≥ 2500 pg/mL (= 0.004), SVI < 25 mL/m2 (= 0.0174), and prior syncope (= 0.0191). The achievement of hematologic response had a positive effect on survival rates (< 0.0001).

CONCLUSION. A comprehensive assessment of cardiac damage by the time of primary AL amyloidosis diagnosis as well as appropriate treatment of this disease can reduce the risk of early cardiac mortality and enhance chances of not only achieving hematologic response but also improving survival rates.

PDF_2024-17-3_237-245 (Russian)

References

  1. Sipe JD, Benson MD, Buxbaum JN, et al. Amyloid fibril protein nomenclature: 2010 recommendations from the nomenclature committee of the International Society of Amyloidosis. Amyloid. 2010;17(3–4):101–4. doi: 10.3109/13506129.2010.526812.
  2. Benson MD, Buxbaum JN, Eisenberg DS, et al. Amyloid nomenclature 2020: update and recommendations by the International Society of Amyloidosis (ISA) nomenclature committee. Amyloid. 2020;27(4):217–22. doi: 10.1080/13506129.2020.1835263.
  3. Comenzo RL How I treat amyloidosis. Blood. 2009;114(15):3147–57. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-04-202879.
  4. Absmeier RM, Rottenaicher GJ, Svilenov HL, et al. Antibodies gone bad—the molecular mechanism of light chain amyloidosis. FEBS J. 2023;290(6):1398–419. doi: 10.1111/febs.16390.
  5. Merlini G, Lousada I, Ando Y, et al. Rationale, application and clinical qualification for NT-proBNP as a surrogate end point in pivotal clinical trials in patients with AL amyloidosis. Leukemia. 2016;30(10):1979–86. doi: 10.1038/leu.2016.191.
  6. Dispenzieri A, Gertz MA, Kyle RA, et al. Serum cardiac troponins and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide: a staging system for primary systemic amyloidosis. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22(18):3751–7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2004.03.029.
  7. Griffin JM, Rosenblum H, Maurer MS. Pathophysiology and Therapeutic Approaches to Cardiac Amyloidosis. Circ Res. 2021;128(10):1554–75. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.121.318187.
  8. Dorbala S. Fibroblast Activation: A Novel Mechanism of Heart Failure in Light Chain Cardiac Amyloidosis? JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2022;15(11):1971–3. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2022.08.019.
  9. Wechalekar AD, Schonland SO, Kastritis E, et al. A European collaborative study of treatment outcomes in 346 patients with cardiac stage III AL amyloidosis. Blood. 2013;121(17):3420–7. doi: 10.1182/blood-2012-12-473066.
  10. Dittrich T, Bochtler T, Kimmich C, et al. AL amyloidosis patients with low amyloidogenic free light chain levels at first diagnosis have an excellent prognosis. Blood. 2017;130(5):632–42. doi: 10.1182/blood-2017-02-767475.
  11. Milani P, Basset M, Russo F, et al. Patients with light-chain amyloidosis and low free light-chain burden have distinct clinical features and outcome. Blood. 2017;130(5):625–31. doi: 10.1182/blood-2017-02-767467.
  12. Palladini G, Dispenzieri A, Gertz MA, et al. New criteria for response to treatment in immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis based on free light chain measurement and cardiac biomarkers: impact on survival outcomes. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(36):4541–9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.37.7614.
  13. Lousada I, Comenzo RL, Landau H, et al. Light chain amyloidosis: patient experience survey from the Amyloidosis Research Consortium. Adv Ther. 2015;32(10):920–8. doi: 10.1007/s12325-015-0250-0.
  14. Grogan M, Dispenzieri A. Natural history and therapy of AL cardiac amyloidosis. Heart Fail Rev. 2015;20(2):155–62. doi: 10.1007/s10741-014-9464-5.
  15. Palladini G, Hegenbart U, Milani P, et al. A staging system for renal outcome and early markers of renal response to chemotherapy in AL amyloidosis. Blood. 2014;124(15):2325–32. doi: 10.1182/blood-2014-04-570010.
  16. Palladini G, Milani P, Merlini G. Novel strategies for the diagnosis and treatment of cardiac amyloidosis. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2015;13(11):1195–211. doi: 10.1586/14779072.2015.1093936.
  17. Kumar S, Dispenzieri A, Lacy MQ, et al. Revised prognostic staging system for light chain amyloidosis incorporating cardiac biomarkers and serum free light chain measurements. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(9):989–95. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.38.5724.
  18. Rapezzi C, Merlini G, Quarta CC, et al. Systemic cardiac amyloidoses: disease profiles and clinical courses of the 3 main types. Circulation. 2009;120(13):1203–12. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.843334.
  19. Gertz MA, Grogan M, Kyle RA, Tajik AJ. Endomyocardial biopsy-proven light chain amyloidosis (AL) without echocardiographic features of infiltrative cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol. 1997;80(1):93–5.
  20. Suresh R, Grogan M, Maleszewski JJ, et al. Advanced cardiac amyloidosis associated with normal interventricular septal thickness: an uncommon presentation of infiltrative cardiomyopathy. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2014;27(4):440–7. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2013.12.010.
  21. Mohty D, Damy T, Cosnay P, et al. Cardiac amyloidosis: updates in diagnosis and management. Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2013;106(10):528–40. doi: 10.1016/j.acvd.2013.06.051.
  22. Buss SJ, Emami M, Mereles DJ, et al. Longitudinal left ventricular function for prediction of survival in systemic light-chain amyloidosis: incremental value compared with clinical and biochemical markers. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;60(12):1067–76. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.04.043.
  23. Thakkar S, Patel HP, Chowdhury M, et al. Impact of Arrhythmias on Hospitalizations in Patients With Cardiac Amyloidosis. Am J Cardiol. 2021;143:125–30. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.12.024.
  24. Ashraf I, Peck MM, Maram R, et al. Association of Arrhythmias in Cardiac Amyloidosis and Cardiac Sarcoidosis. Cureus. 2020;12(8):e9842. doi: 10.7759/cureus.9842.
  25. Giancaterino S, Urey MA, Darden D, Hsu JC. Management of Arrhythmias in Cardiac Amyloidosis. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2020;6(4):351–61. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2020.01.004.
  26. Garcia-Pavia P, Rapezzi C, Adler Y, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of cardiac amyloidosis: A position statement of the ESC Working Group on Myocardial and Pericardial Diseases. Eur Heart J. 2021;42(16):1554–68. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab072.
  27. Porcari A, Rossi M, Cappelli F, et al. Incidence and risk factors for pacemaker implantation in light-chain and transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis. Eur J Heart Fail. 2022;24(7):1227–36. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.2533.
  28. Staron A, Zheng L, Doros G, et al. Marked progress in AL amyloidosis survival: a 40-year longitudinal natural history study. Blood Cancer J. 2021;11(8):139. doi: 10.1038/s41408-021-00529-w.
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2024 Clinical Oncohematology