Esophagogastric Bleedings in Patients with Ph-Negative Myeloproliferative Neoplasms and Extrahepatic Portal Hypertension
ISSN (print) 1997-6933     ISSN (online) 2500-2139
2025-2
PDF_2025-18-2-163-170 (Russian)

Keywords

Ph-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms
thrombotic complications
extrahepatic portal hypertension
esophagogastric variceal bleeding
splenectomy

How to Cite

Batrov P.A., Danishian K.I., Sysoeva E.P., Sabirov K.R., Averbukh O.M., Soboleva O.A., Kitsenko E.K., Lukina E.A. Esophagogastric Bleedings in Patients with Ph-Negative Myeloproliferative Neoplasms and Extrahepatic Portal Hypertension. Clinical Oncohematology. 2025;(2):163–170. doi:10.21320/2500-2139-2025-18-2-163-170.

Statistics

Annotation views: 7
PDF_2025-18-2-163-170 (Russian) downloads: 8

Keywords

Abstract

AIM. To assess the treatment outcomes in esophagogastric bleeding patients with Ph-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) and extrahepatic portal hypertension caused by thrombotic complications.

MATERIALS & METHODS. The present prospective clinical trial performed in the surgical department of the National Research Center for Hematology from 2013 to 2024 enrolled 52 patients with Ph-negative MPNs and extrahepatic portal hypertension caused by total portal vein thrombosis. The median age of patients was 45 years (range 25–68 years). Young (≤ 40 years) and middle-aged (≤ 60 years) patients predominated: 16 (30.8 %) and 31 (59.6 %), respectively. There were 5 (9.6 %) elderly (> 60 years) patients. The V617F mutation in JAK2 was detected in 41 (78.8 %) out of 52 patients.

RESULTS. Splenectomy was performed in 49 patients, 41 (78.8 %) out of them also underwent gastrotomy as well as esophageal/gastric variceal ligation. Gastrotomy was not carried out in 10 (19.2 %) out of 52 patients. Laparotomy with gastrotomy along with esophageal and gastric variceal ligation (without splenectomy) was performed in 3 (5.8 %) patients. Repeated bleedings were registered in 2 of them, which required further splenectomy. Overall incidence of postoperative complications was 21 %. Long-term rebleedings reported in 7 (13.5 %) patients were treated non-surgically. The 5-year overall survival in the total group (n = 52) was 90.1 %. At later stages of Ph-negative MPNs, 5 (9.6 %) deaths were registered as a result of the blast transformation of the disease (n = 3) and thrombohemorrhagic complications (n = 2).

CONCLUSION. Patients with Ph-negative MPNs and extrahepatic portal hypertension caused by portal vein thrombosis represent most complicated cases. However, surgical procedures, such as splenectomy combined with gastrotomy and esophageal/gastric variceal ligation, considerably improve long-term treatment outcomes despite a relatively high incidence of postoperative complications (thrombotic, hemorrhagic, purulent, and inflammatory ones).

PDF_2025-18-2-163-170 (Russian)

References

  1. 1. Plessier A, Darwish-Murad S, Hernandez-Guerra M, et al. European Network for Vascular Disorders of the Liver (EN-Vie). Acute portal vein thrombosis unrelated to cirrhosis: a prospective multicenter follow-up study. Hepatology. 2010;51(1):210–8. doi: 10.1002/hep.23259.
  2. 2. Gerds AT, Gotlib J, Ali H, et al. Myeloproliferative Neoplasms, Version 3.2022, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2022;20(9):1033–62. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2022.0046.
  3. 3. Меликян А.Л., Ковригина А.М., Суборцева И.Н. и др. Национальные клинические рекомендации по диагностике и терапии Ph-негативных миелопролиферативных заболеваний (истинная полицитемия, эссенциальная тромбоцитемия, первичный миелофиброз) (редакция 2018 г.). Гематология и трансфузиология. 2018;63(3):275–315. doi: 10.25837/HAT.2019.51.88.001. [Melikyan A.L., Kovrigina A.M., Subortseva I.N., et al. National clinical recommendations for diagnosis and therapy of Ph-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (polycythemia vera, essential thrombocythemia, primary myelofibrosis) (edition 2018). Russian journal of hematology and transfusiology. 2018;63(3):275–315. doi: 10.25837/HAT.2019.51.88.001. (In Russ)]
  4. 4. Shallis RM, Wang R, Davidoff A, et al. Epidemiology of the classical myeloproliferative neoplasms: The four corners of an expansive and complex map. Blood Rev. 2020;42:100706. doi: 10.1016/j.blre.2020.100706.
  5. 5. Smalberg JH, Arends LR, Valla DC, et al. Myeloproliferative neoplasms in Budd-Chiari syndrome and portal vein thrombosis: a meta-analysis. Blood. 2012;120(25):4921–8. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-09-376517.
  6. 6. Naymagon L, Tremblay D, Zubizarreta N, et al. Portal vein thrombosis patients harboring JAK2V617F have poor long-term outcomes despite anticoagulation. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2020;50(3):652–60. doi: 10.1007/s11239-020-02052-4.
  7. 7. Hall TC, Garcea G, Metcalfe M, et al. Management of acute non-cirrhotic and non-malignant portal vein thrombosis: a systematic review. World J Surg. 2011;35(11):2510–20. doi: 10.1007/s00268-011-1198-0.
  8. 8. Liu A, Naymagon L, Tremblay D. Splanchnic Vein Thrombosis in Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: Treatment Considerations and Unmet Needs. Cancers (Basel). 2022;15(1):11. doi: 10.3390/cancers15010011.
  9. 9. Киценко Е.А., Анисимов А.Ю., Андреев А.И. Современное состояние проблемы кровотечений из варикозно расширенных вен пищевода и желудка. Вестник современной клинической медицины. 2014;7(5):89–98. [Kitsenko E.A., Anisimov A.Yu., Andreev A.I. The modern state of bleeding from variceal enlarged veins of esophagus and stomach. Vestnik sovremennoi klinicheskoi meditsiny. 2014;7(5):89–98. (In Russ)]
  10. 10. Gholam PM. Portal Hypertension and its Complications: A Guided Tour of the Post-Baveno 7 Landscape. Clin Liver Dis. 2024;28(3):xv–xvii. doi: 10.1016/j.cld.2024.05.001.
  11. 11. Батров П.А., Лукина Е.А., Данишян К.И., Киценко Е.А. Внепеченочная портальная гипертензия при миелопролиферативных заболеваниях: особенности диагностики и лечебной тактики. Эндоскопическая хирургия. 2024;30(1):67–79. doi: 10.17116/endoskop20243001167. [Batrov P.A., Lukina E.A., Danishyan K.I., Kitsenko E.A. Extrahepatic portal hypertension in myeloproliferative diseases, features of diagnosis and therapeutic tactics. Endoscopic Surgery. 2024;30(1):67–79. doi: 10.17116/endoskop20243001167. (In Russ)]
  12. 12. Turon F, Casu S, Hernández-Gea V, Garcia-Pagán JC. Variceal and other portal hypertension related bleeding. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2013;27(5):649–64. doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2013.08.004.
  13. 13. Khanna R, Sarin SK. Non-cirrhotic portal hypertension – Diagnosis and management. J Hepatol. 2014;60(2):421–41. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2013.08.013.
  14. 14. Gralnek IM, Camus Duboc M, Garcia-Pagan JC, et al. Endoscopic diagnosis and management of esophagogastric variceal hemorrhage: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline. Endoscopy. 2022;54(11):1094–120. doi: 10.1055/a-1939-4887.
  15. 15. Шерцингер А.Г., Жигалова С.Б., Семенова Т.С., Мартиросян Р.А. Роль эндоскопии в выборе лечения больных портальной гипертензией. Анналы хирургической гепатологии. 2015;20(2):20–30. doi: 10.16931/1995-5464.2015220-30. [Shertsinger A.G., Zhigalova S.B., Semenova T.S., Martirosyan R.A. Role of Endoscopy in the Treatment of Portal Hypertension Patients. Annaly khirurgicheskoy gepatologii. 2015;20(2):20–30. doi: 10.16931/1995-5464.2015220-30. (In Russ)]
  16. 16. Reilly CR, Babushok DV, Martin K, et al. Multicenter analysis of the use of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt for management of MPN-associated portal hypertension. Am J Hematol. 2017;92(9):909–14. doi: 10.1002/ajh.24798.
  17. 17. He FL, Qi RZ, Zhang YN, et al. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt and splenectomy are more effective than endoscopic therapy for recurrent variceal bleeding in patients with idiopathic noncirrhotic portal hypertension. World J Clin Cases. 2020;8(10):1871–7. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i10.1871.
  18. 18. Лебезев В.М., Камалов Ю.Р., Любивый Е.Д. и др. Выбор метода хирургического лечения больных портальной гипертензией. Анналы хирургической гепатологии. 2015;20(1):37–44. doi: 10.16931/1995-5464.2015137-44. [Lebezev V.M., Kamalov Yu.R., Lyubiviy E.D., et al. The Choice of Surgical Management in Patients with Portal Hypertension. Annaly khirurgicheskoy gepatologii. 2015;20(1):37–44. doi: 10.16931/1995-5464.2015137-44. (In Russ)]
  19. 19. Elkrief L, Payancé A, Plessier A, et al. Management of splanchnic vein thrombosis. JHEP Rep. 2023;5(4):100667. doi: 10.1016/j.jhepr.2022.100667.
  20. 20. Назыров Ф.Г., Девятов А.В., Бабаджанов А.Х., Салимов У.Р. Эволюция технологий азигопортального разобщения в профилактике кровотечений портального генеза. Анналы хирургической гепатологии. 2018;23(1):65–73. doi: 10.16931/1995-5464.2018-1-65-73. [Nazyrov F.G., Devyatov A.V., Babadzhanov A.Kh., Salimov U.R. Evolution of Azigoportal Dissociation Technologies in Prevention of Bleedings of Portal Genesis. Annaly khirurgicheskoy gepatologii. 2018;23(1):65–73. doi: 10.16931/1995-5464.2018-1-65-73. (In Russ)]
  21. 21. Шерцингер А.Г., Манукьян Г.В., Жигалова С.Б. и др. Модификация операции М.Д. Пациоры у больных портальной гипертензией. Хирургия. Журнал им. Н.И. Пирогова. 2012;10:9–13. [Shertsinger A.G., Manukian G.V., Zhigalova S.B., et al. The modification of the M.D. Patsiora’s operation by portal hypertension. Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2012;10:9–13. (In Russ)]
  22. 22. Фандеев Е.Е., Любивый Е.Д., Гонсалвес Г.Д. и др. Внепеченочная портальная гипертензия и тромбоз воротной вены (обзор литературы). Анналы хирургической гепатологии. 2015;20(1):45–58. doi: 10.16931/1995-5464.2015145-58. [Fandeyev E.E., Lyubiviy E.D., Gonçalvez G.D., et al. Extrahepatic Portal Hypertension and Portal Vein Thrombosis (Review). Annaly khirurgicheskoy gepatologii. 2015;20(1):45–58. doi: 10.16931/1995-5464.2015145-58. (In Russ)]
  23. 23. Mesa RA. How I treat symptomatic splenomegaly in patients with myelofibrosis. Blood. 2009;113(22):5394–400. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-02-195974.
  24. 24. Tremblay D, Winters A, Beckman JD, et al. Splanchnic vein thrombosis associated with myeloproliferative neoplasms. Thromb Res. 2022;218:8–16. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2022.08.003.
  25. 25. De Franchis R, Bosch J, Garcia-Tsao G, et al. Baveno VII – Renewing consensus in portal hypertension. J Hepatol. 2022;76(4):959–74. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2021.12.022.
  26. 26. Ponziani FR, Zocco MA, Campanale C, et al. Portal vein thrombosis: insight into physiopathology, diagnosis, and treatment. World J Gastroenterol. 2010;16(2):143–55. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i2.143.
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2025 Clinical Oncohematology