Anti-CD38 Antibodies in Monotherapy for Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Real-World Clinical Practice and Results of Clinical Trials
ISSN (print) 1997-6933     ISSN (online) 2500-2139
2025-2
PDF_2025-18-2-145-152 (Russian)

Keywords

multiple myeloma
daratumumab
isatuximab
clinical trials
real-world clinical practice

How to Cite

Ulyanova M.A., Vorobyev V.I., Bychenkova L.A., Semochkin S.V. Anti-CD38 Antibodies in Monotherapy for Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Real-World Clinical Practice and Results of Clinical Trials. Clinical Oncohematology. 2025;(2):145–152. doi:10.21320/2500-2139-2025-18-2-145-152.

Statistics

Annotation views: 11
PDF_2025-18-2-145-152 (Russian) downloads: 17

Keywords

Abstract

AIM. To assess the personal experience with the use of anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies (mAb) for the treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (R/R ММ) patients enrolled in the international clinical trials (CT) as well as those treated in real-world clinical practice (RWCP).

MATERIALS & METHODS. The present retrospective study includes 63 R/R ММ patients (43 men and 20 women) who received daratumumab or isatuximab monotherapy from 2016 to 2020. The age of patients was 44–80 years; the median time by the start of the therapy to be assessed was 65 years. The analyzed cohort included 24 patients enrolled in the international multi-center CTs (daratumumab IV was administered to 14, daratumumab SC was given to 5, and isatuximab IV was applied in 5 of them). In RWCP, all 39 patients received daratumumab IV. The median number of prior therapy lines in the total cohort was 4 (range 1–10), in the CT group it was 5 (range 2–10), and in the RWCP group it was 4 (range 1–7). Resistance to bortezomib and lenalidomide occurred essentially in all patients under this study.

RESULTS. With the follow-up median of 20 months (range 1–62 months), overall response was 50 % in the CT group and 29.3 % in the RWCP group (= 0.094). The 2-year progression-free survival in these groups of patients was 16.7 and 2.6 %, respectively (= 0.052). In the CT group, the 2-year overall survival was reported to be 54.2 ± 10.2 % (median 26.5 months) vs. 34.6 ± 7.8 % (median 17 months) in the RWCP group (hazard ratio 0.47; = 0.022).

CONCLUSION. The outcomes of anti-CD38 mAb monotherapy in the RWCP group lag behind those in patients enrolled in the international multi-center CTs. Although approaches to R/R MM treatment continue to be improved, anti-CD38 mAb monotherapy provides a certain treatment niche for heavily pretreated patients with bone marrow hematopoietic exhaustion and cumulative organ toxicity in cases when administration of intensive triplets can cause hypertoxicity. Infusion-related reactions associated with daratumumab or isatuximab mostly occur on their first administration and are not worse than grade 1/2. A switch from IV to SC daratumumab shortens the administration time from a few hours to 3–5 minutes and considerably reduces the incidence of infusion-related reactions.

PDF_2025-18-2-145-152 (Russian)

References

  1. 1. Hassan H, Szalat R. Genetic Predictors of Mortality in Patients with Multiple Myeloma. Appl Clin Genet. 2021;14:241–54. doi: 10.2147/TACG.S262866.
  2. 2. Gerecke C, Fuhrmann S, Strifler S, et al. The Diagnosis and Treatment of Multiple Myeloma. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2016;113(27–28):470–6. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2016.0470.
  3. 3. Huang J, Chan SC, Lok V, et al. The epidemiological landscape of multiple myeloma: a global cancer registry estimate of disease burden, risk factors, and temporal trends. Lancet Haematol. 2022;9(9):e670–e677. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(22)00165-X.
  4. 4. Каприн А.Д., Старинский В.В., Шахзадова А.О., Лисичникова И.В. Злокачественные новообразования в России в 2022 году (заболеваемость и смертность). М.: МНИОИ им. П.А. Герцена — филиал ФГБУ «НМИЦ радиологии» Минздрава России, 2023. 275 с. [Kaprin A.D., Starinskii V.V., Shakhzadova A.O., Lisichnikova I.V. Zlokachestvennye novoobrazovaniya v Rossii v 2022 godu (zabolevaemost i smertnost). (Malignant neoplasms in Russia in 2022 (incidence and mortality.) Moscow: MNIOI im. P.A. Gertsena — filial FGBU “NMITs radiologii” Publ.; 2023. 275 p. (In Russ)]
  5. 5. LeBlanc MR, Zhou X, Baggett CD, et al. Second Line Therapy in Multiple Myeloma: A SEER Medicare Analysis. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2024;24(9):611–20. doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2024.04.005.
  6. 6. Kumar SK, Lee JH, Lahuerta JJ, et al. Risk of progression and survival in multiple myeloma relapsing after therapy with IMiDs and bortezomib: a multicenter international myeloma working group study. Leukemia. 2012;26(1):149–57. doi: 10.1038/leu.2011.196.
  7. 7. Семочкин С.В. Новые ингибиторы протеасомы в терапии множественной миеломы. Онкогематология. 2019;14(2):29–40. doi: 10.17650/1818-8346-2019-14-2-29-40. [Semochkin S.V. New proteasome inhibitors in the management of multiple myeloma. Oncohematology. 2019;14(2):29–40. doi: 10.17650/1818-8346-2019-14-2-29-40. (In Russ)]
  8. 8. Durer C, Durer S, Lee S, et al. Treatment of relapsed multiple myeloma: Evidence-based recommendations. Blood Rev. 2020;39:100616. doi: 10.1016/j.blre.2019.100616.
  9. 9. Инструкция по медицинскому применению лекарственного препарата Дарзалекс (электронный документ). Доступно по: https://cdn.pharm-portal.ru/69jxs7cjr4n4gdc2acy5y4x8/instructions/ЛП-008138/InstrImg_2022_05_18_1481515/8ec176e2-6248-49cf-bc77-d51ef2151bcf.pdf. Ссылка активна на 12.12.2024. [Darzalex: Package insert (Internet). Available from: https://cdn.pharm-portal.ru/69jxs7cjr4n4gdc2acy5y4x8/instructions/ЛП-008138/InstrImg_2022_05_18_1481515/8ec176e2-6248-49cf-bc77-d51ef2151bcf.pdf. Accessed 12.12.2024. (In Russ)]
  10. 10. Инструкция по медицинскому применению препарата Сарклиза (электронный документ). Доступно по: https://cdn.pharm-portal.ru/69jxs7cjr4n4gdc2acy5y4x8/instructions/ЛП-006430/InstrImg_2021_10_05_1473975/7aefc86c-4287-4e4f-8931-c1f0af43fd9e.pdf. Ссылка активна на 12.12.2024. [Sarclisa: Package Insert (Internet). Available from: https://cdn.pharm-portal.ru/69jxs7cjr4n4gdc2acy5y4x8/instructions/ЛП-006430/InstrImg_2021_10_05_1473975/7aefc86c-4287-4e4f-8931-c1f0af43fd9e.pdf. Accessed 12.12.2024. (In Russ)]
  11. 11. Cook G, Corso A, Streetly M, et al. Daratumumab Monotherapy for Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Results of an Early Access Treatment Protocol in Europe and Russia. Oncol Ther. 2021;9(1):139–51. doi: 10.1007/s40487-020-00137-x.
  12. 12. Mateos MV, Nahi H, Legiec W, et al. Subcutaneous versus intravenous daratumumab in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (COLUMBA): a multicentre, open-label, non-inferiority, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Haematol. 2020;7(5):e370–e380. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(20)30070-3.
  13. 13. Dimopoulos M, Bringhen S, Anttila P, et al. Isatuximab as monotherapy and combined with dexamethasone in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Blood. 2021;137(9):1154–65. doi: 10.1182/blood.2020008209.
  14. 14. Rajkumar SV, Dimopoulos MA, Palumbo A, et al. International Myeloma Working Group updated criteria for the diagnosis of multiple myeloma. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15(12):e538–е548. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70442-5.
  15. 15. Kumar S, Paiva B, Anderson KC, et al. International Myeloma Working Group consensus criteria for response and minimal residual disease assessment in multiple myeloma. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17(8):e328–e346. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30206-6.
  16. 16. Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0. Available from: https://ctep.cancer.gov/protocoldevelopment/electronic_applications/docs/ctcae_v5_quick_reference_5x7.pdf (accessed 12.12.2024).
  17. 17. Usmani SZ, Nahi H, Plesner T, et al. Daratumumab monotherapy in patients with heavily pretreated relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: final results from the phase 2 GEN501 and SIRIUS trials. Lancet Haematol. 2020;7(6):e447–e455. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(20)30081-8.
  18. 18. Usmani SZ, Weiss BM, Plesner T, et al. Clinical efficacy of daratumumab monotherapy in patients with heavily pretreated relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. Blood. 2016;128(1):37–44. doi: 10.1182/blood-2016-03-705210.
  19. 19. Shah JJ, Abonour R, Gasparetto C, et al. Analysis of Common Eligibility Criteria of Randomized Controlled Trials in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Patients and Extrapolating Outcomes. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2017;17(9):575–83.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2017.06.013.
  20. 20. Rajkumar SV. Multiple myeloma: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk-stratification, and management. Am J Hematol. 2024;99(9):1802–24. doi: 10.1002/ajh.27422.
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2025 Clinical Oncohematology