Approaches to the Treatment of Patients with Myelofibrosis and Polycythemia Vera with Constitutional Symptoms in Real-World Clinical Practice in the Russian Federation: Intermediate Results of a Multi-Center Observational Prospective Clinical Study
ISSN (print) 1997-6933     ISSN (online) 2500-2139
2023-2
PDF_2023-16-2_146-153 (Russian)

Keywords

polycythemia vera
myelofibrosis
hydroxycarbamide
interferon-α
ruxolitinib

How to Cite

Melikyan A.L., Subortseva I.N., Kulikov S.M., Chabaeva Y.A., Gilyazitdinova E.A., Novoselov K.P., Knyazeva E.A., Egorova A.S., Stepochkin I.S., Koroleva E.V., Sycheva T.M., Belgesova V.P., Putintseva A.Y., Senderova O.M., Vasil’eva I.V., Komartseva E.Y., Kaplina A.A., Bakhtina V.I., Mikhalev M.A., Chernykh Y.B., Parovichnikova E.N. Approaches to the Treatment of Patients with Myelofibrosis and Polycythemia Vera with Constitutional Symptoms in Real-World Clinical Practice in the Russian Federation: Intermediate Results of a Multi-Center Observational Prospective Clinical Study. Clinical Oncohematology. 2024;(2):146–153. doi:10.21320/2500-2139-2023-16-2-146-153.

Keywords

Abstract

Aim. To describe the methods of drug therapy implemented for the disease control in patients with polycythemia vera (PV) and myelofibrosis (MF) as well as to analyze manifestations and severity of the disease symptoms in real-world clinical practice.

Materials & Methods. The analysis focused on the data of 1229 patients. In 629 (51.18 %) patients, PV was diagnosed, MF was identified in 521 (42.39 %) patients. The diagnosis of 79 (6.43 %) patients was not reported. Early stage of primary MF (PMF) was detected in 182 (34.93 %) patients, PMF fibrosis stage was identified in 251 (48.18 %) patients, post-polycythemic MF was registered in 61 (11.71 %) patients, and 13 (2.5 %) patients showed post-thrombocythemic MF. In 14 (2.69 %) patients, MF type was not reported. By the time of diagnosis, the median age of PV patients was 56 years (range 17–86 years), and that of MF patients was 55 years (range 16–83 years) (= 0.022). The proportion of women among PV patients was 57 %, among MF patients it was 65 % (= 0.0065).

Results. The assessment of thrombotic complication risk in PV showed that 51.01 % (n = 302) of patients belong to the low-risk, 39.86 % (n = 236) belong to the intermediate-risk, and only 9.12 % (n = 54) of patients belong to the high-risk groups. Distribution of MF patients between risk groups demonstrates favorable prognosis for most patients. The group of low and intermediate-1 risks includes 56.43 % (n = 294) patients according to the prognostic scoring system IPSS and 68.52 % (n = 357) according to the prognostic scoring system DIPSS. In the vast majority of cases, patients received hydroxycarbamide therapy: 81.81 % (n = 832) in the total cohort, 83.33 % (n = 465) in the PV group, and 79.96 % (n = 367) in the MF group. Interferon-α was administered to 19.71 % (n = 110) of PV patients and 29.85 % (n = 137) of MF patients. Ruxolitinib was assigned to 3.14 % (n = 19) of PV patients and 21.35 % (n = 98) of MF patients.

Conclusion. Regular monitoring of the PV and MF course and treatment efficacy can provide recommendations for adequate change of therapy in case of the failure of previous treatment. It should be emphasized that the timely switch to the second-line therapy results in reduced disability and mortality among PV and MF patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms.

PDF_2023-16-2_146-153 (Russian)

References

  1. Arber DA, Orazi A, Hasserjian R, et al. The 2016 revision to the World Health Organization classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia. Blood. 2016;127(20):2391–405. doi: 10.1182/blood-2016-03-643544.
  2. Меликян А.Л., Туркина А.Г., Ковригина А.М. и др. Клинические рекомендации по диагностике и терапии Ph-негативных миелопролиферативных заболеваний (истинная полицитемия, эссенциальная тромбоцитемия, первичный миелофиброз) (редакция 2016 г.). Гематология и трансфузиология. 2017;62(1-S1):25–60.
  3. [Melikyan AL, Turkina AG, Kovrigina AM, et al. Clinical guidelines on diagnosis and treatment of Ph-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (polycythemia vera, essential thrombocythemia, and primary myelofibrosis) (2016 edition). Gematologiya i transfuziologiya. 2017;62(1-S1):25–60. (In Russ)]
  4. Меликян А.Л., Ковригина А.М., Суборцева И.Н. и др. Национальные клинические рекомендации по диагностике и терапии Ph-негативных миелопролиферативных заболеваний (истинная полицитемия, эссенциальная тромбоцитемия, первичный миелофиброз) (редакция 2018 г.) Гематология и трансфузиология. 2018;63(3):275–315. doi: 10.25837/HAT.2019.51.88.001.
  5. [Melikyan AL, Kovrigina AM, Subortseva IN, et al. National clinical recommendations for diagnosis and therapy of Ph-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (polycythemia vera, essential thrombocythemia, primary myelofibrosis) (edition 2018). Gematologia i transfuziologia. 2018;63(3):275–315. doi: 10.25837/HAT.2019.51.88.001. (In Russ)]
  6. Меликян А.Л., Суборцева И.Н., Шуваев В.А. и др. Современный взгляд на диагностику и лечение классических Ph-негативных миелопролиферативных заболеваний. Клиническая онкогематология. 2021;14(1):129–37. doi: 10.21320/2500-2139-2021-14-1-129-137.
  7. [Melikyan AL, Subortseva IN, Shuvaev VA, et al. Current View on Diagnosis and Treatment of Classical Ph-Negative Myeloproliferative Neoplasms. Clinical oncohematology. 2021;14(1):129–37. doi: 10.21320/2500-2139-2021-14-1-129-137. (In Russ)]
  8. Ионова Т.И., Андреевская Е.А., Бабич Е.Н. и др. Актуальные аспекты качества жизни у пациентов с классическими Ph-негативными миелопролиферативными новообразованиями в Российской Федерации: обсуждение результатов национальной наблюдательной программы МПН-КЖ-2020. Клиническая онкогематология. 2021;15(2):176–97. doi: 10.21320/2500-2139-2022-15-2-176-197.
  9. [Ionova TI, Andreevskaya EA, Babich EN, et al. Current Quality-of-Life Aspects in Patients with Classical Ph-Negative Myeloproliferative Neoplasms in the Russian Federation: Overview of the Outcomes of the National Observational Program MPN-QoL-2020. Clinical oncohematology. 2022;15(2):176–97. doi: 10.21320/2500-2139-2022-15-2-176-197. (In Russ)]
  10. Langlais BT, Mazza GL, Kosiorek HE, et al. Validation of a Modified Version of the Myeloproliferative Neoplasm Symptom Assessment Form Total Symptom Score. J Hematol. 2021;10(5):207–11. doi: 10.14740/jh914.
  11. Rungjirajittranon T, Owattanapanich W, Ungprasert P, Ruchutrakool T. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the prevalence of thrombosis and bleeding at diagnosis of Philadelphia-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms. BMC Cancer. 2019;19(1):184. doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-5387-9.
  12. Меликян А.Л., Суборцева И.Н., Суханова Г.А. Тромбогеморрагические осложнения у больных Ph-негативными миелопролиферативными заболеваниями. Кровь. 2014;2:21–5.
  13. [Melikyan AL, Subortseva IN, Sukhanova GA. Thrombo-hemorrhagic complications in patients with Ph-negative myeloproliferative diseases. Krov’. 2014;2:21–5. (In Russ)]
  14. Танашян М.М., Кузнецова П.И., Суборцева И.Н. и др. Хроническая и острая цереброваскулярная патология при Ph-негативных миелопролиферативных заболеваниях. Гематология и трансфузиология. 2016;61(3):146–50. doi: 10.18821/0234-5730-2016-61-3-146-150.
  15. [Tanashyan MM, Kuznetsova PI, Subortseva IN, et al. Chronic and acute cerebrovascular pathology in patients with Ph-negative myeloproliferative diseases. Gematologiya i transfuziologiya. 2016;61(3):146–50. doi: 10.18821/0234-5730-2016-61-3-146-150. (In Russ)]
  16. Танашян М.М., Кузнецова П.И., Суборцева И.Н., Меликян А.Л. Клинические особенности цереброваскулярной патологии при Ph-негативных миелопролиферативных заболеваниях. Клиническая фармакология и терапия. 2016;25(5):54–7.
  17. [Tanashyan MM, Kuznetsova PI, Subortseva IN, Melikyan AL. Clinical characteristics of cerebrovascular pathology in Ph-negative myeloproliferative diseases. Klinicheskaya farmakologiya i terapiya. 2016;25(5):54–7. (In Russ)]
  18. Sukhanova GA, Melikyan AL, Vakhrusheva MV, et al. Treatment of portal thrombosis in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms: a single-institution experience. Blood. 2014;124(21):5098.
  19. Суханова Г.А., Вахрушева М.В., Колосова Л.Ю. и др. Опыт лечения портальных тромбозов препаратом «Антитромбин III» у пациентов с хроническими миелопролиферативными заболеваниями. Тромбоз, гемостаз и реология. 2014;2(58):44–52.
  20. [Sukhanova GA, Vakhrusheva MV, Kolosova LYu, et al. Experience of treating portal thromboses with Antithrombin III in patients with chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms. Tromboz, gemostaz i reologiya. 2014;2(58):44–52. (In Russ)]
  21. Cervantes F, Dupriez B, Pereira A, et al. New prognostic scoring system for primary myelofibrosis based on a study of the International Working Group for Myelofibrosis Research and Treatment. Blood. 2009;113(13):2895–901. doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-07-170449.
  22. Passamonti F, Cervantes F, Vannucchi AM, et al. Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System (DIPSS) predicts progression to acute myeloid leukemia in primary myelofibrosis. Blood. 2010;116(15):2857–8. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-06-293415.
  23. Gangat N, Caramazza D, Vaidya R, et al. DIPSS Plus: A Refined Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System for Primary Myelofibrosis That Incorporates Prognostic Information From Karyotype, Platelet Count, and Transfusion Status. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(4):392–7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.32.2446.
  24. Меликян А.Л., Суборцева И.Н., Галстян Г.М. Протокол дифференцированного посиндромного лечения больных первичным миелофиброзом. В кн.: Алгоритмы диагностики и протоколы лечения заболеваний системы крови. Под ред. А.В. Абрамовой, А.О. Абдуллаева и др. М.: Практика, 2018. Т. 2. С. 777–802.
  25. [Melikyan AL, Subortseva IN, Galstyan GM. Protocol of differentiated syndromic treatment of patients with primary myelofibrosis. In: Abramova AV, Abdullaev AO, et al., eds. Algoritmy diagnostiki i protokoly lecheniya zabolevanii sistemy krovi. (Diagnostic algorithms and treatment protocols in hematological diseases.) Moscow: Praktika Publ.; 2018. Vol. 2. pр. 777–802. (In Russ)]
  26. Меликян А.Л., Суборцева И.Н. Протокол дифференцированной терапии молодых больных истинной полицитемией и эссенциальной тромбоцитемией. В кн.: Алгоритмы диагностики и протоколы лечения заболеваний системы крови. Под ред. А.В. Абрамовой, А.О. Абдуллаева и др. М.: Практика, 2018. Т. 2. С. 825–44.
  27. [Melikyan AL, Subortseva IN. Protocol of differentiated therapy of young patients with polycythemia vera and essential thrombocytemia. In: Abramova AV, Abdullaev AO, et al., eds. Algoritmy diagnostiki i protokoly lecheniya zabolevanii sistemy krovi. (Diagnostic algorithms and treatment protocols in hematological diseases.) Moscow: Praktika Publ.; 2018. Vol. 2. pр. 825–44. (In Russ)]
  28. Ломаиа Е.Г., Сиордия Н.Т., Сендерова О.М. и др. Ранний ответ и отдаленные результаты терапии миелофиброза руксолитинибом: многоцентровое ретроспективное исследование в 10 центрах Российской Федерации. Клиническая онкогематология. 2020;13(3):335–45. doi: 10.21320/2500-2139-2020-13-3-335-345.
  29. [Lomaia EG, Siordiya NT, Senderova OM, et al. Early Response and Long-Term Outcomes of Ruxolitinib Therapy in Myelofibrosis: Multicenter Retrospective Study in 10 Centers of the Russian Federation. Clinical oncohematology. 2020;13(3):335–45. doi: 10.21320/2500-2139-2020-13-3-335-345. (In Russ)]
  30. Marchioli R, Finazzi G, Landolfi R, et al. Vascular and neoplastic risk in a large cohort of patients with polycythemia vera. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(10):2224–32. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.07.062.
  31. Passamonti F, Cervantes F, Vannucchi AM, et al. A dynamic prognostic model to predict survival in primary myelofibrosis: a study by the IWG-MRT (International Working Group for Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Research and Treatment). Blood. 2009;115(9):1703–8. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-09-245837.
  32. Verstovsek S, Mesa RA, Gotlib I, et al. A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Ruxolitinib for Myelofibrosis. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(9):799–807. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1110557.
  33. Vannucchi AM, Kantarjian HM, Kiladjian J-J, et al. A pooled analysis of overall survival in COMFORT-I and COMFORT-II, 2 randomized phase III trials of ruxolitinib for the treatment of myelofibrosis. Haematologica. 2015;100(9):1139–45. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2014.119545.
  34. Verstovsek S, Mesa RA, Gotlib J, et al. Long-term treatment with ruxolitinib for patients with myelofibrosis: 5-year update from the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 COMFORT-I trial. J Hematol Oncol. 2017;10(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s13045-017-0417.
  35. Emanuel RM, Dueck AC, Geyer HL, et al. Myeloproliferative Neoplasm (MPN) Symptom Assessment Form Total Symptom Score: Prospective International Assessment of an Abbreviated Symptom Burden Scoring System Among Patients With MPNs. J Сlin Oncol. 2012;30(33):4098–103. doi: 10.1200/jco.2012.42.3863.
  36. Ионова Т.И., Виноградова О.Ю., Ефремова Е.В. и др. Разработка и результаты апробации русской версии опросника MPN10 для оценки симптомов у пациентов с миелопролиферативными новообразованиями с учетом международных рекомендаций. Клиническая онкогематология. 2020;13(2):176–84. doi: 10.21320/2500-2139-2020-13-2-176-184.
  37. [Ionova TI, Vinogradova OYu, Efremova EV, et al. Development and Validation Results of the Russian MPN10 Form for Symptom Assessment in Patients with Myeloproliferative Neoplasms in Compliance with International Recommendations. Clinical oncohematology. 2020;13(2):176–84. doi: 10.21320/2500-2139-2020-13-2-176-184. (In Russ)]
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.