Early Response and Long-Term Outcomes of Ruxolitinib Therapy in Myelofibrosis: Multicenter Retrospective Study in 10 Centers of the Russian Federation

E.G. Lomaia, Nadiya Tamazovna Siordiya, O.M. Senderova, O.E. Ochirova, E.B. Zhalsanova, A.Yu. Furtovskaya, G.P. Dimov, M. G. Pozina, O.Yu. Li, K.B. Trizna, M.A. Mikhalev, E.V. Sokurova, A.A. Otmorskaya, A.S. Khazieva, V.V. Ust’yantseva, Yu.D. Rogovaya, A.Yu. Zaritskey,

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21320/2500-2139-2020-13-3-335-345

Aim. To assess the efficacy of targeted therapy with ruxolitinib in patients with myelofibrosis in real clinical practice in Russia. To determine the prognostic value of spleen reduction in the early stages of ruxolitinib treatment and its effect on overall survival.

Materials & Methods. The present retrospective study was based on the data of 10 centers of Russia. It included 56 myelofibrosis (primary or post-polycythemic and post-thrombocythemic) patients who received ruxolitinib. The median age of patients was 56 years (range 26–76 years). Most of them (59 %) were considered intermediate-1 risk according to DIPSS and had massive splenomegaly (80 %), and constitutional symptoms (86 %). The initial drug dose was 30 mg per day in 64 % of cases, and the level of thrombocytes was ≥ 200 × 109/L in 61 % of patients. The spleen size was evaluated by palpation.

Results. By the start of data collection most of patients (79 %) had been treated with ruxolitinib. In no case therapy was withdrawn for the reason of drug toxicity. On ruxolitinib constitutional symptoms were reversed in 70 %, 87 %, and 98 % of patients by months 1, 3 and 6, respectively. In 36 % and 46 % of patients by months 3 and 6, respectively, ≥ 50 % decrease in spleen size was observed. Overall, in 31 % and 27 % of cases the size of the spleen decreased by less than 25 % by months 3 and 6, respectively. The factors affecting the changes in spleen size have not been identified. The probability of overall survival by years 2 and 5 of follow-up was 97 % and almost 70 %, respectively. This parameter was significantly affected by the extent of spleen size reduction by month 3 of follow-up as well as by its initial size.

Conclusion. Ruxolitinib shows high efficacy for both decrease of general myelofibrosis symptoms and reduction in spleen size. The extent of spleen reduction is an important prognostic factor. In patients with insufficient spleen reduction an increase in drug dose is advisable. If it is not possible, alternative methods of treatment should be sought.

  • E.G. Lomaia VA Almazov National Medical Research Center, 2 Akkuratova str., Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation, 197341 ; ФГБУ «НМИЦ им. В.А. Алмазова» Минздрава России, ул. Аккуратова, д. 2, Санкт-Петербург, Российская Федерация, 197341
  • Nadiya Tamazovna Siordiya VA Almazov National Medical Research Center, 2 Akkuratova str., Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation, 197341 ; ФГБУ «НМИЦ им. В.А. Алмазова» Минздрава России, ул. Аккуратова, д. 2, Санкт-Петербург, Российская Федерация, 197341
  • O.M. Senderova Irkutsk Regional Clinical Hospital, 100 Yubileinyi microdistrict, Irkutsk, Russian Federation, 664049 ; ГБУЗ «Иркутская ордена “Знак Почета” областная клиническая больница», микрорайон Юбилейный, д. 100, Иркутск, Российская Федерация, 664049
  • O.E. Ochirova NA Semashko Republican Clinical Hospital, 12 Pavlova str., Ulan-Ude, Russian Federation, 670031 ; ГАУЗ «Республиканская клиническая больница им. Н.А. Семашко», ул. Павлова, д. 12, Улан-Удэ, Российская Федерация, 670031
  • E.B. Zhalsanova NA Semashko Republican Clinical Hospital, 12 Pavlova str., Ulan-Ude, Russian Federation, 670031 ; ГАУЗ «Республиканская клиническая больница им. Н.А. Семашко», ул. Павлова, д. 12, Улан-Удэ, Российская Федерация, 670031
  • A.Yu. Furtovskaya VA Almazov National Medical Research Center, 2 Akkuratova str., Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation, 197341 ; ФГБУ «НМИЦ им. В.А. Алмазова» Минздрава России, ул. Аккуратова, д. 2, Санкт-Петербург, Российская Федерация, 197341
  • G.P. Dimov Municipal Clinical Hospital No. 1, 16 Vorovskogo str., Chelyabinsk, Russian Federation, 454048 ; МАУЗ «ОТКЗ Городская клиническая больница № 1», ул. Воровского, д. 16, Челябинск, Российская Федерация, 454048
  • M. G. Pozina Municipal Clinical Hospital No. 1, 16 Vorovskogo str., Chelyabinsk, Russian Federation, 454048 ; МАУЗ «ОТКЗ Городская клиническая больница № 1», ул. Воровского, д. 16, Челябинск, Российская Федерация, 454048
  • O.Yu. Li Sakhalin Regional Clinical Hospital, 430 Mira pr-t, Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk, Russian Federation, 693004 ; ГБУЗ «Сахалинская областная клиническая больница», пр-т Мира, д. 430, Южно-Сахалинск, Российская Федерация, 693004
  • K.B. Trizna Tomsk Regional Clinical Hospital, 96 Ivana Chernykh str., Tomsk, Russian Federation, 634063 ; ОГAУЗ «Томская областная клиническая больница», ул. И. Черных, д. 96, Томск, Российская Федерация, 634063
  • M.A. Mikhalev Krasnoyarsk Interdistrict Clinical Hospital No. 7, 4 Akademika Pavlova str., Krasnoyarsk, Russian Federation, 660003 ; КГБУЗ «Красноярская межрайонная клиническая больница № 7», ул. Академика Павлова, д. 4, Красноярск, Российская Федерация, 660003
  • E.V. Sokurova Vladivostok Polyclinic No. 4, 5 Voropaeva str., Vladivostok, Russian Federation, 690000 ; КГБУЗ «Владивостокская поликлиника № 4», ул. Воропаева, д. 5, Владивосток, Российская Федерация, 690000
  • A.A. Otmorskaya Regional Clinical Hospital, 1 Lyapidevskogo str., Barnaul, Russian Federation, 656024 ; КГБУЗ «Краевая клиническая больница», ул. Ляпидевского, д. 1, Барнаул, Российская Федерация, 656024
  • A.S. Khazieva Krasnoyarsk Regional Clinical Hospital, 3A Partizana Zheleznyaka str., Krasnoyarsk, Russian Federation, 660022 ; Красноярская краевая клиническая больница, ул. Партизана Железняка, д. 3А, Красноярск, Российская Федерация, 660022
  • V.V. Ust’yantseva Railway Clinical Hospital, the Chelyabinsk Railway Station, 41 Tsvillinga str., Chelyabinsk, Russian Federation, 454000 ; НУЗ «Дорожная клиническая больница на ст. Челябинск ОАО «РЖД», ул. Цвиллинга, д. 41, Челябинск, Российская Федерация, 454000
  • Yu.D. Rogovaya VA Almazov National Medical Research Center, 2 Akkuratova str., Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation, 197341 ; ФГБУ «НМИЦ им. В.А. Алмазова» Минздрава России, ул. Аккуратова, д. 2, Санкт-Петербург, Российская Федерация, 197341
  • A.Yu. Zaritskey VA Almazov National Medical Research Center, 2 Akkuratova str., Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation, 197341 ; ФГБУ «НМИЦ им. В.А. Алмазова» Минздрава России, ул. Аккуратова, д. 2, Санкт-Петербург, Российская Федерация, 197341
  1. Tefferi A, Lasho TL, Jimma T, et al. One Thousand Patients With Primary Myelofibrosis: The Mayo Clinic Experience. Mayo Clin Proc. 2012;87(1):25–33. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2011.11.001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2011.11.001
  2. Patriarca F, Bacigalupo A, Sperotto A, et al. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in myelofibrosis: the 20-year experience of the Gruppo Italiano Trapianto di Midollo Osseo (GITMO). Haematologica. 2008;93(10):1514–22. doi: 10.3324/haematol.12828. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3324/haematol.12828
  3. Harrison CN, Mesa RA, Kiladjian JJ, et al. Health-related quality of life and symptoms in patients with myelofibrosis treated with ruxolitinib versus best available therapy. Br J Haematol. 2013;162(2):229–39. doi: 10.1111/bjh.12375. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjh.12375
  4. Verstovsek S, Mesa RA, Gotlib I, et al. A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Ruxolitinib for Myelofibrosis. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(9):799–807. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1110557. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1110557
  5. Verstovsek S, Mesa RA, Gotlib I, et al. Long-term treatment with ruxolitinib for patients with myelofibrosis: 5-year update from the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 COMFORT-I trial. J Hematol Oncol. 2017;10(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s13045-017-0417-z. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13045-017-0417-z
  6. Miller CB, Komrokji RS, Mesa RA, et al. Practical Measures of Clinical Benefit With Ruxolitinib Therapy: An Exploratory Analysis of COMFORT-I. Clin Lymphoma Myel Leuk. 2017;17(8):479–87. doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2017.05.015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clml.2017.05.015
  7. Vardiman JW, Thiele J, Arber DA, et al. The 2008 revision of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia: rationale and important changes. Blood. 2009;114(5):937–51. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-03-209262. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2009-03-209262
  8. Arber DA, Orazi A, Hasserjian R, et al. The 2016 revision to the World Health Organization classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia. Blood. 2016;127(20):2391–405. doi: 10.1182/blood-2016-03-643544. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2016-03-643544
  9. Tefferi A, Cervantes F, Mesa R, et al. Revised response criteria for myelofibrosis: International Working Group-Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Research and Treatment (IWG-MRT) and European LeukemiaNet (ELN) consensus report. 2013;122(8):1395–8. doi: 10.1182/blood-2013-03-488098. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2013-03-488098
  10. Джакави® (инструкция по медицинскому применению). Novartis Pharma, AG (Швейцария). Доступно по: https://www.vidal.ru/drugs/jakavi Ссылка активна на 15.05.2020.[Jakavi® (package insert). Novartis Pharma, AG, Switzerland. Available from: https://www.vidal.ru/drugs/jakavi__38878. (accessed 15.05.2020) (In Russ)]
  11. Verstovsek S, Kantarjian HM, Estrov Z, et al. Long-term outcomes of 107 patients with myelofibrosis receiving JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor ruxolitinib: survival advantage in comparison to matched historical controls. Blood. 2012;120(6):1202–9. doi: 10.1182/blood-2012-02-414631. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2012-02-414631
  12. Vannucchi AM, Kantajian HM, Kiladjian JJ, et al. A pooled analysis of overall survival in COMFORT-I and COMFORT-II, 2 randomized phase III trials of ruxolitinib for the treatment of myelofibrosis. Haematologica. 2015;100(9):1139–45. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2014.119545. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2014.119545
  13. Mesa RA, Verstovsek S, Gupta V, et al. Effects of ruxolitinib treatment on metabolic and nutritional parameters in patients with myelofibrosis from COMFORT-I. Clin Lymphoma Myel Leuk. 2015;15(4):214–21.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2014.12.008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clml.2014.12.008
  14. Palandri F, Palumbo GA, Bonifacio M, et al. Baseline factors associated with response to ruxolitinib: an independent study on 408 patients with myelofibrosis. Oncotarget. 2017;8(45):79073–86. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.18674. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.18674
  15. Palandri F, Tiribelli M, Benevolo G, et al. Efficacy and safety of ruxolitinib in intermediate-1 IPSS risk myelofibrosis patients: Results from an independent study. Hematol Oncol. 2018;36(1):285–90. doi: 10.1002/hon.2429. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/hon.2429
  16. Palandri F, Catani L, Bonifacio M, et al. Ruxolitinib in elderly patients with myelofibrosis: impact of age and genotype. A multicentre study on 291 elderly patients. Br J Haematol. 2018;183(1):35–46. doi: 10.1111/bjh.15497. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjh.15497
  17. Harrison CN, Schaap N, Vannucchi A, et al. Fedratinib (FEDR) in myelofibrosis (MF) patients previously treated with ruxolitinib (RUX): A reanalysis of the JAKARTA-2 study. HemaSphere. 2019;3:671–72. doi: 10.1097/01.hs9.0000564100.83392.c9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.HS9.0000564100.83392.c9
  18. Al-Ali HK, Griesshammer M, le Coutre P, et al. Safety and efficacy of ruxolitinib in an open-label, multicenter, single-arm phase 3b expanded-access study in patients with myelofibrosis: a snapshot of 1144 patients in the JUMP trial. 2016;101(9):1065–73. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2016.143677. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2016.143677

Keywords:

myelofibrosis, ruxolitinib, spleen size changes, constitutional symptoms, overall survival

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

01.07.2025

Issue

MYELOID TUMORS

How to Cite

Lomaia E.G., Siordiya N.T., Senderova O.M., et al. Early Response and Long-Term Outcomes of Ruxolitinib Therapy in Myelofibrosis: Multicenter Retrospective Study in 10 Centers of the Russian Federation. Clinical Oncohematology. Basic Research and Clinical Practice. 2025;13(3):335–345. doi:10.21320/2500-2139-2020-13-3-335-345.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 > >>